The Evolution of Image Sensors: CCD vs. CMOS
The field of image sensor technology is continuously evolving, with two dominant technologies competing for supremacy in various applications: Charge-Coupled Devices (CCD) and Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS). While discussions about the growing market share of CMOS sensors are frequent, it’s important to recognize that both technologies have unique strengths depending on the application.
In our previous articles, we explored these topics in depth, covering the advantages and disadvantages of each technology for specific use cases:
- CCD vs. CMOS Image Sensors in Machine Vision Cameras
- CCD vs. CMOS Image Sensors in Machine Vision Update
- Can small pixel CMOS Image Sensors be Useful in Machine Vision?
- CCD vs. CMOS Image Sensors in Global Security Cameras
- CCD vs. CMOS in Traffic Applications
We encourage readers to revisit these discussions and share their insights on this ongoing debate.
Recent Innovations with Adimec’s QUARTZ CMOS Sensors
Adimec recently showcased advancements at the 2012 Vision Show Event in Boston, MA (May 8–10), where they displayed innovations at Booth #401. The company highlighted enhancements to their latest CMOS-based QUARTZ sensor family and its ultra-high-resolution capabilities.
Key improvements include:
- Reduced power consumption by approximately 2.5W.
- More efficient dual CoaXPress interface implementation.
- Frame-to-frame stability improved by a factor of 2.5.
- Higher resolution options, including up to 12 MP and beyond.
These updates demonstrate CMOS technology’s growing capability in delivering high performance with efficiency gains that align well for modern imaging needs.
Last Updated: 2025-09-04 19:00:23